
Glenn Kenny, formerly chief film critic for Premiere magazine and now freelancer for people like MSN, caused a whole bunch of people to comment on a recent comment that, from the outset, seemed to be a throwaway personal note about how he organizes his DVD shelf at home.
The post is located here, and got me thinking about my my "auteur" shelf at home. The little bookshelf in my room that is at least somewhat organized by auteur, contains the following filmmakers: Paul Verhoeven, John Waters, David Cronenberg, Martin Scorsese, Richard Linklater, Terry Gilliam, Sam Raimi, Michael Bay (yeah - you heard me), David Fincher, Steven Soderbergh, Brian De Palma, John Carpenter, Alfred Hitchcock, and Quentin Tarantino.
My home video collection is currently in disarray as DVDs and Blu-rays are battling for control of precious real estate (I write for a Blu-ray website and when I buy shit like this, it doesn't help matters). And recently I've felt compelled to try to put my Criterion Blu-rays in order of spine number (see above - our professional photographer had the day off), which means I have to cannibalize from my various auteur sections (The Curious Case of Benjamin Button, spine #476, would be taken from my David Fincher Q; ditto Che, spine #496, gone from Soderberghville; etc.)
It made me think about all the miscellaneous stuff I have out in our little movie room (where all my Kubrick movies are) and what happens in more elaborate box set situations (think about the Alien box set, which has movies by Ridley Scott, David Fincher, Jeunet, and James Cameron - each one of them could easily warrant their own spot on the auteur shelf but, thanks to their inclusion in the box set remain together, alone)
One of the commentators on the original Kenny post suggested that if they have three or more movies by a director, then they automatically get privileged shelf space. While this is great in theory (and not only because that rule could allow me to have a Richard Kelly slot), it gets messy in practice, leaving you with a whole bunch of micro-sub-categories that will probably make it impossible for you to figure out where anything is.
The internal turmoil continues. I'm sure I'll make up my mind and come up with a really efficient categorization system one that stimulates conversation while still being easy to figure out.
Or not.
The post is located here, and got me thinking about my my "auteur" shelf at home. The little bookshelf in my room that is at least somewhat organized by auteur, contains the following filmmakers: Paul Verhoeven, John Waters, David Cronenberg, Martin Scorsese, Richard Linklater, Terry Gilliam, Sam Raimi, Michael Bay (yeah - you heard me), David Fincher, Steven Soderbergh, Brian De Palma, John Carpenter, Alfred Hitchcock, and Quentin Tarantino.
My home video collection is currently in disarray as DVDs and Blu-rays are battling for control of precious real estate (I write for a Blu-ray website and when I buy shit like this, it doesn't help matters). And recently I've felt compelled to try to put my Criterion Blu-rays in order of spine number (see above - our professional photographer had the day off), which means I have to cannibalize from my various auteur sections (The Curious Case of Benjamin Button, spine #476, would be taken from my David Fincher Q; ditto Che, spine #496, gone from Soderberghville; etc.)
It made me think about all the miscellaneous stuff I have out in our little movie room (where all my Kubrick movies are) and what happens in more elaborate box set situations (think about the Alien box set, which has movies by Ridley Scott, David Fincher, Jeunet, and James Cameron - each one of them could easily warrant their own spot on the auteur shelf but, thanks to their inclusion in the box set remain together, alone)
One of the commentators on the original Kenny post suggested that if they have three or more movies by a director, then they automatically get privileged shelf space. While this is great in theory (and not only because that rule could allow me to have a Richard Kelly slot), it gets messy in practice, leaving you with a whole bunch of micro-sub-categories that will probably make it impossible for you to figure out where anything is.
The internal turmoil continues. I'm sure I'll make up my mind and come up with a really efficient categorization system one that stimulates conversation while still being easy to figure out.
Or not.